EN
Get a free consultation

Groupage Shipping (LCL): How It Actually Works, Its Advantages and Drawbacks, and When It Is a Mistake

The short answer

Groupage shipping (LCL) is not a smaller slice of space aboard the ship but a full chain of services: your goods are moved to a consolidation warehouse (CFS) at the port of loading and stuffed into a single container alongside the goods of other shippers, then the container is stripped at a consolidation warehouse at the port of discharge, where the packages are sorted and released to each importer separately. Your document in it is a House B/L from the consolidator, not a Master B/L from the shipping line. The price is worked out on the chargeable weight, that is the greater of the volume in cubic metres and the weight in tonnes, on the rule that one cubic metre is equivalent to 1,000 kg, with rounding up and a minimum that is usually one cubic metre. The fixed charges — CFS handling, documentation, the delivery order and local port charges — do not shrink as the shipment shrinks, and they are what turns the economics of small shipments. Its advantages are real: starting to import with a small quantity, less capital tied up, and testing a new supplier before committing to a container. Its drawbacks are real too: more expensive per unit, one to two weeks slower, higher risks of damage and of shared delay, and destination charges that take by surprise anyone who compared the freight alone.

The thing importers most often misunderstand about groupage is that they take it for a "smaller container". It is nothing of the sort. Groupage — LCL, short for Less than Container Load — is not a smaller slice of space you buy aboard the ship. It is a full chain of services added before sailing and after it: a warehouse that receives your goods and measures them, stuffing alongside strangers' goods into a single container, then stripping, sorting and individual delivery on arrival. Every link in that chain carries a cost, a delay and a risk.

Understand that chain and you understand everything that follows: why LCL costs more per unit, why it is slower, why the final invoice comes in higher than the first quotation promised, and why goods are damaged in it more often. This guide is therefore a deep dive into LCL itself, not a price comparison between it and a full container — the break-even calculation in cubic metres, container capacities and which of the two options is cheaper are handled separately in the full container load (FCL) versus groupage (LCL) guide, and this one completes it with what happens inside the black box itself.

What is groupage (LCL) shipping and how does it work?

It means your goods are moved to a consolidation warehouse at the port of loading, stuffed into a single container alongside the goods of other shippers, after which that container is stripped at a consolidation warehouse at the port of discharge, where the packages are sorted and released to each importer separately. The warehouse at both ends is called a CFS, short for Container Freight Station, and it is the key that explains all of LCL's advantages and drawbacks alike.

Your shipment's journey has five stages, not one:

StageWhere it happensWhat actually happens there
Delivery to the consolidation warehousePort of loading in ChinaYour goods move from the factory to the CFS warehouse, where they are received, measured, weighed and recorded with the very figures you will be charged on
Stuffing — consolidationCFS at originYour goods are stacked alongside those of other shippers in a single container, and the container is not closed until it is full or the booking closing falls due
The sea legAt seaThe container travels exactly like any other container, and the sea itself is rarely the source of delay in LCL
Stripping — deconsolidationCFS at destinationThe container is moved from the quay to the warehouse, opened and emptied, and the packages are sorted to their owners by their markings
Release and deliveryDestinationEach portion is cleared separately under its own file and documents, then each importer collects their share from the warehouse

Note that three of these five stages happen on land, not at sea. That is a practical observation, not a theoretical one: when an LCL shipment runs late the cause is usually a warehouse rather than a ship, and when it is damaged the cause is usually handling rather than the swell. An importer who negotiates LCL as though it were sea freight alone has negotiated the part of the service that matters least to their experience.

What is the difference between a House B/L and a Master B/L, and why does it matter to you?

In groupage you do not receive the shipping line's bill of lading; you receive one the consolidator issues in its own name, called a House B/L. The shipping line does not know you exist. It sees one container whose shipper is the consolidator (or its agent), and it issues a single bill of lading for it — the Master B/L. The consolidator then divides that container among its own customers and issues each of them a House B/L for their portion.

Three practical consequences are worth knowing before you book rather than after:

  • Your contractual relationship is with the consolidator, not with the shipping line. If a dispute, damage or delay arises, your claim goes to whoever issued you the House B/L. That means the consolidator's solvency, reputation and insurance cover are part of the product you are buying, not an administrative detail.
  • Release on arrival passes through two links, not one. The consolidator's agent at destination must first have the Master B/L released to it before it can release your share to you. A hold-up in the first link — for reasons that have nothing to do with you — stops you.
  • Party details must be checked closely. The consignee's name and address, the description of the goods and the number of packages on the House B/L must match your invoice and your packing list word for word, because that is the document your customs file will be built on. For the general grounding here, see import documents and customs clearance.

So the first professional question to put to a consolidator is not "what is your rate per cubic metre?" but "who is your agent at the port of discharge?". A consolidator with no settled, known agent at your destination is selling you a service half of which sits outside its control.

How is the price of a groupage shipment calculated?

It is calculated on the chargeable weight, which is the greater of the actual weight in tonnes and the volume in cubic metres, on the customary sea freight rule that one cubic metre is equivalent to 1,000 kg. The consolidator compares the two figures and charges you on the larger of them, and this is what quotations call W/M, short for Weight or Measurement. It has nothing to do with the volumetric weight formula in air freight: that is a division by 6,000, this is a direct comparison between a tonne and a cubic metre.

Two examples show both directions at once:

  • Heavy, dense goods: a shipment of 2 cubic metres weighing 3,000 kg. Volume is 2 and weight is 3 (in tonnes), so it is charged on 3 units, not on 2, even though it took up only two metres. This is the case with marble powder and building materials, set out in detail in importing marble powder from China.
  • Bulky, light goods: a shipment of 8 cubic metres weighing 900 kg. Volume is 8 and weight is 0.9, so it is charged on 8 units. This is the case with paper cups, empty packaging and furniture, set out in detail in importing paper cups from China.

Then comes what most importers overlook, and it is more dangerous than the formula itself:

  • Rounding up. Many consolidators round fractions up — to a tenth of a cubic metre, to a quarter of one, or to a whole metre, each according to its own policy — so a shipment of 1.12 cubic metres may be charged as 1.2 or as 2.
  • The minimum. Most consolidators impose a minimum per shipment, usually one cubic metre, so a shipment of 0.3 cubic metres is charged as a full metre — meaning you pay three times what you actually took up before the charges even begin.
  • The figures that count are the warehouse's, not your factory's. Measuring and weighing take place at the CFS on receipt, and they may differ from what is on the supplier's packing list if the packaging is larger than declared. So ask the factory for the final carton dimensions after packing and work out your own volume before you book.
  • Fixed charges do not shrink as your shipment shrinks. CFS handling, documentation fees, the delivery order (D/O) fee and local port charges are lump sums, or close to it, payable in full whether you ship one metre or ten. They are what turns the economics, not the price per cubic metre.

Why does a small shipment become more expensive per cubic metre?

Because the fixed charges are divided over a smaller volume, so each unit's share of them rises sharply. Here is a worked example with hypothetical figures, for illustration and not for pricing — sea freight at USD 35 per cubic metre, CFS handling at destination at USD 18 per metre, fixed charges totalling USD 150 (documentation, delivery order and local port charges), and a minimum of one cubic metre:

Item0.4 cbm shipment2 cbm shipment8 cbm shipment
Chargeable volume after the minimum1 cubic metre28
Sea freightUSD 3570280
CFS handling at destinationUSD 1836144
Fixed chargesUSD 150150150
TotalUSD 203256574
Cost per actual cubic metreabout USD 508about 128about 72

Look at the last line: the small shipment cost seven times what the large one cost for every actual cubic metre, and the whole difference comes from the fixed charges and the minimum, not from the freight. The fixed charges make up around three quarters of the first shipment's invoice, and only around a quarter of the third's.

The direct practical lesson: if your shipment is under two cubic metres, compare it against air freight before you book by sea. The gap may be smaller than you think, for a far shorter transit and less handling, and we set the comparison out in sea freight versus air freight. And if your shipment is getting close to half a container, the other question comes into play, answered in detail in the FCL versus LCL guide.

What are the advantages of groupage (LCL) shipping?

Its essential advantage is that it breaks the link between your ability to import and the size of a container. Before it existed, the small importer either bought enough to fill a container or did not import at all, and LCL is what opened direct importing to those who do not need twenty cubic metres. Its advantages in detail:

  • You do not need a quantity that fills a container. You start with one cubic metre or three, entering the market with a new product without betting on a quantity you do not yet know you can sell.
  • Less capital tied up. A full container means goods paid for in full and waiting months to be sold; a small shipment keeps your cash available for other orders, for marketing, or for an opportunity that comes up suddenly. That is a line in your cash flow, not in your margin alone, and we set it out in the real cost of importing from China.
  • Less stock and a smaller obsolescence risk. Goods sitting idle in your warehouse are a silent cost: rent, damage, fashion that moves on, and a newer model released.
  • Testing a new supplier before committing to a container. In our judgement this is by far the most useful use of LCL. A small shipment from a supplier you have not tried reveals their real quality, their timekeeping, their way of packing and how they respond when you complain — at a cost of error that stays small.
  • Diversifying lines across several suppliers. You can bring five items from five factories in small quantities instead of committing to a single item that fills a container.
  • Faster reordering. Instead of waiting two months until you have enough to fill a container, you order every three or four weeks, keeping your shelves stocked and your cash cycle quicker.

What are the risks and drawbacks of groupage shipping?

Its essential drawback is that your goods leave your control more often: they are opened, handled, stacked and sorted by hands you do not know, and they share the fate of a container in which you own no more than a share. Here are its drawbacks in full honesty:

  • Considerably more expensive per unit. As you saw in the example above, and the smaller the shipment the wider the gap.
  • Slower. The container is not closed until it is full or the booking closing falls due, and your goods may wait days in the origin warehouse for consolidation to complete; then on arrival they wait for the container to be moved to the CFS, stripped and sorted before your clearance can even begin. Add one to two weeks on top of the sea transit itself, and more in peak seasons.
  • Higher damage risk. Your goods are handled more often, by forklifts and labour working for speed rather than for care, and they are stacked next to strangers' goods that may be heavier and end up on top of them, or liquid and liable to leak, or strongly scented so that the smell passes into your packaging.
  • Shared delay risk. This is its most insidious drawback: another shipper's cargo in the same container may be held by customs, or be short of documents, or have its description questioned, and the whole container is held up while you are neither at fault nor able to do anything about it. Groupage containers are also more exposed to inspection, given the number of owners and the variety of contents.
  • Co-loading. The consolidator you booked with may sell its share to a larger consolidator, so the chain lengthens, House bills multiply, responsibility weakens, and it becomes hard to know who bears what when something goes wrong.
  • Surprise destination charges. This is what importers complain about most in LCL, and we devote the next section to it.
  • Packing has to be stronger. Packing standards that are adequate in a full container sealed at your factory are nowhere near adequate for a shipment handled four times and stacked under someone else's goods.
  • Less flexibility on dates. Consolidators' closing times are tighter, and missing the closing means waiting for the next container, not the next vessel — and the difference can be a full week.

How do you weigh LCL's advantages against its drawbacks before booking?

By looking at each advantage together with the price that goes with it, not at two separate lists. Every gain in LCL is paid for out of another pocket, and the sound decision is to know which pocket you are paying from:

The advantageWhat it costs youWhat settles it
You start with a small quantity, without a full containerA far higher cost per cubic metreCan your margins carry that difference? Work it into your selling price before you buy, not after
Less capital tied up and less stockOne to two weeks longer in transitAre your goods seasonal or tied to a date? If they are, the saving in cash may be swallowed by a sale you miss
Testing a new supplier at small riskMore handling and a higher chance of damageWill the supplier be blamed unfairly for damage? Document the condition of the goods before you hand them to the consolidator
Diversifying lines across several suppliersScattered packages, a more complex file and split responsibilityCan you consolidate them at origin before handing them to the consolidator? That solves half the problem
Faster reordering and shelves that stay stocked longerFixed charges that recur with every shipmentMultiply the fixed charges by the number of shipments a year and compare the result against two large shipments

Why do destination charges take you by surprise in a groupage quotation?

Because some consolidators quote a very low sea freight rate — sometimes even zero — and make it back through high charges collected from you on arrival, when you have no option left. We say so plainly because it is among the commonest complaints importers make, and it is a widespread practice rather than a rare exception.

The mechanism is simple and easy to follow: the consolidator knows you compare quotations on a single line, the price per cubic metre, so it makes that line attractive and puts its profit into items you will not see until your goods have arrived and refusal has become impossible — you cannot send back a shipment that has landed. The usual items are: CFS handling at destination, the delivery order (D/O) fee, documentation fees, terminal handling charges, storage charges if stripping is delayed, and extra handling charges for heavy or out-of-gauge packages.

Protecting yourself from this is simple if you hold to it before booking:

  • Ask for an all-in quotation through to delivery, in writing, setting out the destination charges item by item with their amounts, not with a phrase like "local charges as per tariff".
  • Ask outright: which items will I be paying on arrival? And ask for the answer in writing by email, because what is written can be gone back to and what is spoken is denied.
  • Do not compare two quotations on the price per cubic metre. Compare them on the total landed figure, because the one with the higher freight may be the cheaper invoice.
  • Understand the agreed delivery term, since it is what determines where the seller's responsibility ends and yours begins, and many of these "surprises" are nothing but ignorance of what the term written on the invoice means. See Incoterms 2020.

When is LCL the right decision and when is it a mistake?

It is the right decision when your volume is genuinely small, time is not pressing and the goods can take the handling; it is a mistake when it is taken out of habit instead of out of calculation. Here is a plain table:

Your situationThe decisionWhy
A first shipment testing a supplier or a marketLCLThe cost of error stays small, and this is its most useful use
Your volume is 2 to 10 cubic metres and time is not pressingLCLThe natural range for groupage, and the one where the fixed charges are bearable
You buy small quantities from several suppliersLCL after consolidation at originConsolidating before handover to the consolidator makes it one shipment with one line of responsibility
You need a monthly repeat to keep your shelves stockedLCLA faster cycle and better cash flow than waiting for a container to fill
Your volume is under one cubic metreCheck air freight firstThe minimum and the fixed charges eat the saving, and air freight is far quicker
Your volume is close to half a container or above itCost out the full containerThe gap narrows until it reverses, and it is set out in detail in the FCL versus LCL guide
Seasonal goods, or goods tied to a binding dateAvoid LCLThe extra fortnight and the shared delay risk cannot be borne here
Goods that are very bulky and very lightAvoid LCLThey are charged on volume, and volume kills them on price for nothing in return
Highly fragile goodsAvoid LCLFour handlings and stacking under someone else's goods
Goods needing temperature controlAvoid LCLRefrigerated services in groupage are rare and limited in the destinations they cover

Which goods are simply unsuited to groupage shipping?

Say it plainly: some goods are unsuited to LCL however small your quantity, and choosing it for them is not a saving but a deferred loss. The main ones:

  • Very bulky and very light: cups, empty packaging, foam and furniture that is not knocked down. They are charged on their volume, so the cost per unit becomes unreasonable, and the better course with them is to wait until you fill a high cube container.
  • Highly fragile: glass, mirrors, thin ceramics and screens. Good packaging is not enough here, because the problem lies in the number of handlings, not in the carton.
  • Anything needing temperature control: sensitive foodstuffs, preparations, and materials affected by humidity. Refrigerated LCL services do exist, but they are rare and limited in their lines and destinations, so do not assume they are available.
  • Dangerous goods, chemicals and batteries: many consolidators refuse them, or impose charges and requirements on them that wipe out any expected saving.
  • Strongly scented or leak-prone goods: here you are the hazard to your neighbours in the container, and you may bear the liability for ruining their goods.
  • High in value and small in volume: air freight suits these better, because the price gap narrows while the gap in time and security widens.

How do you pack your goods for groupage shipping?

The rule: pack on the assumption that your packages will be put under goods heavier than they are, not on the assumption that anyone will read a "do not stack" label. In LCL those labels are a recommendation, not a guarantee, and the container is stacked on the logic of filling the space, not on the logic of protecting your goods in particular.

  • Double-wall cartons rather than single-wall, with internal dunnage that stops movement inside the package.
  • A wooden pallet compliant with ISPM 15 wherever possible, since it lifts your goods off the floor, protects them from moisture and from the forklift, and makes them a single unit to handle.
  • Stretch wrap and cardboard edge protectors, with strapping that stops the packages coming loose from the pallet.
  • Clear markings on at least three sides carrying the consignee's name, the shipment reference number and the package count in the form "1 of 6", because sorting at the CFS relies on what can be read from the outside, not on what is in the documents.
  • Weight distributed so that no single package is heavy in a way that calls for special handling at an extra charge.
  • Photographic documentation of the condition of the packages before you hand them to the consolidator, since it is your only evidence if a package arrives damaged. For the detail on packing, labelling and barcodes, see packaging, labelling and barcode requirements.

This is one of the points a new importer most often gets wrong, and we have gathered its counterparts in common first-import mistakes.

When is LCL cheaper than a full container?

When your volume is small enough that its freight and charges together stay below the price of a full container inclusive of its own charges — and that is an arithmetical break-even point, not a general rule. In practice, anything under ten cubic metres usually stays in LCL, anything above fifteen moves to a container, and what lies between is a grey area settled by an actual comparison of two written quotations covering everything through to delivery.

But note a professional point many people overlook: the cheapest is not necessarily the soundest. LCL may be USD 200 cheaper and cost you two weeks of delay and one damaged package, which makes it the more expensive option in fact. Cost the money, the time and the risk together. For the detailed price comparison with container capacities, how to calculate cubic metres and where the break-even point falls, see the full container load (FCL) versus groupage (LCL) guide, which is devoted to that question alone.

Alshumul's role in groupage shipping

Alshumul Commercial Services is an import and export company based in Guangzhou — that is, at the end where most LCL problems are both made and solved: the consolidation warehouse at the port of loading. What is put right before the goods are handed to the consolidator is cheap to correct; what is discovered after stripping at the port of discharge is expensive or impossible.

What we handle on groupage shipments:

  • Arranging groupage through specialist consolidators: we book for you with consolidation companies and shipping lines and compare their quotations on routing and number of transhipments, not on price alone. If your goods come from several suppliers, we arrange consolidation with a specialist consolidator in China, so that one shipment is sent and one file is cleared instead of several small files that are hard to track and hard to claim on.
  • Pre-shipment inspection: drawing random samples and checking the goods against the agreed specification, with a photographic report, before they enter the warehouse. For the detail, see pre-shipment inspection and acceptance levels.
  • Packing suited to LCL specifically: reinforcing the cartons, palletising where it helps, marking on more than one side, and documenting the condition of the packages photographically before handover — because the packing standard in groupage is higher than in a full container, not equal to it.
  • Reviewing the quotation so that it covers destination charges and not the freight alone: we ask for the full statement in writing and read it through with you item by item before booking, so that you know your true landed figure before you price your goods rather than after they arrive.
  • Costing the most suitable option before booking: measuring the actual volume and weight of the goods after packing, working out the chargeable weight, and setting out whether LCL, a full container or air freight is the better course in your particular case — even if the answer is to wait until your volume builds up.
  • Following up documents and release: matching the invoice, the packing list and the House B/L word for word, following up their issue in time to precede arrival, and giving early warning if anything appears that threatens the stripping schedule.

The practical benefit is that you deal with a single party responsible for the whole Chinese end, so you do not find yourself between a supplier saying the package left them intact and a consolidator saying it received it that way, with you a continent away from both. To understand the full landed cost items, see the real cost of importing from China, and for the price comparison between a full container and groupage, see the FCL versus LCL guide.

All questions → All services → Back to the blog →

Frequently asked questions on this topic

What clients ask most before the first shipment or the first technical project.

All questions →

Groupage shipping (LCL — Less than Container Load) means your goods are moved to a consolidation warehouse called a CFS at the port of loading, stuffed into a single container alongside the goods of other shippers, after which the container sails, is stripped at a consolidation warehouse at the port of discharge, and the packages are sorted to their owners so that each importer collects their share once it has been cleared separately. It is not a smaller container but a chain of services: three of its five stages happen on land rather than at sea, which is why delay in it usually comes from the warehouses and not from the vessel, and damage from the handling and not from the voyage.

It is calculated on the chargeable weight, which is the greater of the actual weight in tonnes and the volume in cubic metres, on the customary sea freight rule that one cubic metre is equivalent to 1,000 kg, and quotations denote it W/M. So a shipment of 2 cubic metres weighing 3 tonnes is charged on three units, while a shipment of 8 cubic metres weighing 900 kg is charged on eight units. To that are added rounding up, the minimum, which is usually one cubic metre, and the fixed charges: CFS handling, documentation, the delivery order and local port charges.

Because the fixed charges do not shrink as the shipment shrinks, so they are divided over a smaller volume and each unit's share of them rises sharply. In a worked example with freight at USD 35 per metre, CFS handling at USD 18 per metre, fixed charges of USD 150 and a minimum of one metre: a 0.4 cubic metre shipment costs about USD 203, that is about USD 508 per actual metre; a 2 metre shipment costs USD 256, that is 128 per metre; and an 8 metre shipment costs USD 574, that is about 72 per metre. That is a sevenfold difference between the first and the third, and it comes from the fixed charges rather than the freight. The figures are hypothetical, for illustration and not for pricing.

In groupage you do not receive the shipping line's bill of lading but one the consolidator issues in its own name, called a House B/L, while the shipping line issues a single bill for the whole container, the Master B/L, in the name of the consolidator or its agent. The effect is that your contractual relationship is with the consolidator and not with the line, so any claim for damage or delay goes to the consolidator, and its solvency and reputation are part of the product you are buying. Release on arrival also passes through two links: the Master B/L is released to the consolidator's agent first, and only then is your share released to you, so a hold-up in the first link stops you. Ask the consolidator about its agent at the port of discharge before you ask about its price.

Its essential advantage is that it breaks the link between your ability to import and the size of a container. You do not need a quantity that fills a container but start with one cubic metre or three; less of your capital stays tied up, your stock is smaller and the obsolescence risk lower; you can test a new supplier with a small shipment before committing to a container, which is by far its most useful use; you can diversify your lines across several suppliers in small quantities; and you can reorder every three or four weeks instead of waiting two months until you have enough to fill a container.

Its essential drawback is that your goods leave your control more often and share the fate of a container in which you own no more than a share. It is considerably more expensive per unit; it is one to two weeks slower because of waiting for the container to fill at departure and for stripping and sorting on arrival; its damage risk is higher because of the number of handlings and because of stacking next to strangers' goods that may be heavier or liable to leak; it exposes you to shared delay, since another shipper's cargo in the same container may be held and hold up the whole of it; the consolidator may sell its share to another consolidator, so the chain lengthens and responsibility weakens; destination charges may take you by surprise; and it needs stronger packing than a full container does.

Co-loading is when the consolidator you booked with sells its share of the container to a larger consolidator instead of operating the container itself. Its effect is that the chain lengthens, House bills multiply and responsibility weakens, so when something goes wrong it becomes hard to know who bears it and to whom the claim should go, and the closing and sailing schedule ends up outside the control of the party you actually contracted with. This does not mean always refusing it, as it is a widespread practice, but ask outright: do you operate the container yourself or hand it to another consolidator? And who is your agent at the port of discharge? The answer shows you how long a chain you are entering.

Because some consolidators quote a very low sea freight rate, sometimes even zero, and make it back through high charges collected on arrival when you have no option left, since you cannot send back a shipment that has landed. The usual items are CFS handling at destination, the delivery order (D/O) fee, documentation fees, terminal handling charges, storage if stripping is delayed, and extra handling for heavy packages. Your protection is to ask for an all-in quotation through to delivery, in writing, with its items and their amounts rather than a phrase like "local charges as per tariff"; to ask in writing what you will be paying on arrival; and to compare two quotations on the total landed figure rather than on the price per cubic metre.

Add one to two weeks on top of the sea transit itself, and more in peak seasons. The reason lies at both ends: at departure the container is not closed until it is full or the booking closing falls due, so your goods may wait days in the warehouse, and on arrival the container is moved from the quay to the consolidation warehouse, stripped and the packages sorted before your clearance can even begin. To that is added the risk of shared delay if another shipper's cargo in the same container runs into trouble. So do not choose groupage for seasonal goods or for goods tied to a binding date.

When your volume is genuinely small, time is not pressing and the goods can take the handling. Its clearest cases are: a first shipment testing a supplier or a market; a volume between two and ten cubic metres; buying small quantities from several suppliers with consolidation at origin before handover to the consolidator; or a need for a monthly repeat that keeps your shelves stocked and your cash cycle quicker. If your volume is under one cubic metre, check air freight first, because the minimum and the fixed charges eat the saving; and if it is getting close to half a container, cost out the full container.

Goods that are very bulky and very light, such as cups, empty packaging, foam and furniture that is not knocked down, because they are charged on their volume and the volume kills them on price. Highly fragile goods such as glass, mirrors and thin ceramics, because the problem lies in the number of handlings and not in the quality of the carton. Anything needing temperature control, since refrigerated LCL services are rare and limited in their lines. Dangerous goods, chemicals and batteries, which many consolidators refuse or load with charges that wipe out any saving. Strongly scented or leak-prone goods, because you are the hazard to your neighbours in the container. And goods high in value and small in volume, which air freight suits better.

Pack on the assumption that your packages will be put under goods heavier than they are, not on the assumption that anyone will read a "do not stack" label, since in groupage that is a recommendation and not a guarantee. Use double-wall cartons with internal dunnage that stops movement, put the goods on a pallet compliant with ISPM 15 wherever possible, wrap them in stretch film with cardboard edge protectors, put clear markings on at least three sides with the consignee's name, the shipment reference number and the package count in the form "1 of 6", because sorting at the warehouse relies on what can be read from the outside, distribute the weights to avoid special handling charges, and document the condition of the packages photographically before handing them to the consolidator, since that is your only evidence.

The full container versus groupage guide answers the comparison question: which of the two options is cheaper, what container capacities are in cubic metres, how to calculate your shipment's volume, and where the break-even point between the two options falls. This guide answers a different question: how groupage itself works from the inside — the consolidation warehouse, stuffing and stripping, House B/L versus Master B/L, chargeable weight with its minimum and its rounding, co-loading, destination charges, and which goods are simply unsuited to it. So read that one if you are weighing two options against each other, and read this one if you have already chosen groupage and want to run it intelligently.

Related articles